Finally, my favourite new acquisition: a hand-painted Scott's plaque from c1840, with the text 'Mate sound the Pump, morning, noon and Night'.
For the last couple of years I've been working on a new website cataloguing the transfers found on jugs, mugs and bowls, and other lustre-decorated items. But that's not to say I've completed cataloguing plaques. I'm constantly surprised by what turns up. Here are a few highlights.
The green-bordered plaque on the left above is a rare and wonderful example of the most common verse, Prepare to Meet My God. Under it is the text 'Whoso leadeth a Godly life; Shall be my Servant'. It pairs with a Thou God transfer, which I have tentatively attributed to Maling. But although I have seen three or four versions of the Thou God, I had never seen a Prepare, until this one came up.
I've always loved these plaques with three relief angels, from an as yet unidentified pottery. I knew that versions with the transfer-printed 'Prepare' verse existed, but had never seen one in the flesh. Recently two came up in fast succession.
Staying with the angel plaques, here's a previously unrecorded verse. Ecclesiastes 12:1 'Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth'.
Above left is another hand-painted verse with distinctive decoration, and unusual black, blue and yellow borders. Above right, a hand-painted plaque attributed to Thomas Fell, St Peter's Pottery, Newcastle.
Above are two very pretty variants of the Sheriff Hill verse plaques. They have blue hand-painted flowers above the verses.
The two plaques above have 'Come box the compass' transfers. Although these are often recorded on jugs and bowls, I'd never seen them on a plaque before. The above left transfer appears on Maling wares. The above right appears on late Moore's items (c1870).
Above is a rare Staffordshire plaque attributed to T & B Godwin, New Wharf Pottery. This 'Christmas Day' transfer more often appears on children's plates.
Above are two more Staffordshire plaques: left, a boy walking a girl over a bridge; right, a mother and child.
Finally, my favourite new acquisition: a hand-painted Scott's plaque from c1840, with the text 'Mate sound the Pump, morning, noon and Night'.
So even after nearly 20 years of collecting plaques, there are new things to discover. Don't forget to check the Sunderland Pottery Transfers site I've been working on.
The jug below is attributed to Seaham Pottery, and has very different decoration to the items I've written about so far.
It is attributed to Seaham on the basis of a similar jug, in the Sunderland Museum displays, with the inscription 'Margaret Davison', 'Seaham Harbour' and the date 'July 1829'. That's not quite the end of the story though, because the Seaham Pottery wasn't built until 1836. So: either the jug was made at another pottery in 1829 before the Seaham Pottery was built; or the jug was made by Seaham Pottery at a later date for Margaret, perhaps as a birthday gift.
The Byron transfer is after a painting of the poet, with his servant Robert Rushton, by George Sanders (1774–1846) in the Royal Collection. There's a copy of the painting at Newstead Abbey, Lord Byron's home. (As discussed before, Byron was married in Seaham in 1815, so has a local connection.) Please see Ian Holmes' site for two mugs with the transfer.
The Byron transfer is also found on items with a distinctive view of the Sunderland Bridge. In Baker it is listed as view number 5, with a note about the paddle steamer in the background.
The jug above is undecorated, and was likely sold as a factory second. Often these undecorated items have firing cracks or flaws. The items below are more typical with the elaborate lustre decoration associated with these Seaham-attributed jugs.
If you have a similarly decorated item, please get in touch. If we could find another with a dated inscription, we might get a step closer to proving these items were made at Seaham Pottery after 1836.
Norman Lowe has done some digging in the census records and made some interesting discoveries.
Taking all of that into account, it seems possible, perhaps even probable, that the jug was given to Margaret on her 21st birthday in 1850. William Davison is recorded as being a dock pilot born in Monkwearmouth in 1826. Aged 24 in 1850, he would have worked as a seaman, going out to meet incoming ships and navigating them into the harbour.
So perhaps neither William nor Margaret had much interest in the poetry of Byron. For them, the untitled image would have been of young William standing on the shore. At this stage in their relationship, the other transfers on the jug, regarding the sailor's life, and young children playing, would also have had personal poignancy.
All this considered, the Seaham attribution now seems more secure. The jug would have been made around the time the pottery changed hands. Walker sold the premises at an auction on December 11th, 1850. R.C. Wilson then ran the pottery from 1850 to 1852. So my money is on the jug being made at the end of Walker's ownership.
Thanks, once again, to Norman Lowe for getting in touch regarding my recent posts. In my last post I wrote about two frog mugs, with variations of the Sailor's Return transfer. Both have been attributed to Seaham. However, the one below right, from the Sunderland Museum collection, has lustre decoration similar to marked items from Thomas Ainsworth's Stockton Pottery. As you are probably bored of hearing by now, the transfer on the left mug below, also appears on a plaque with the inscription 'A Present for E. Towning'.
Norman did some digging in the census records and writes 'Interestingly there was an Elizabeth Towning born 1860 in Stockton!' So is it possible that the items above were all made in Stockton, and not Seaham, after all? The Stockton Pottery was founded in the 1840s and closed in 1901, so was certainly turning out wares in 1860. Moore's Pottery was mass-producing similar larger-sized rectangular plaques in the 1860s, so the style of mould might fit the date.
However, I think 1860 is too late for the plaques above. Take a look at the first three plaques below. The Seaham Pottery was producing identical large and similarly decorated religious verse plaques at the time the E. Towning plaques were made. We know that by 1850 the pottery had ceased making these plaques (the religious ones at least), and the copper transfer plate had found its way to John Carr's Low Lights Pottery in North Shields. The final plaque below, although unmarked, has Carr in it's DNA. The lustre decoration and distinctive red inscription, combined with the smaller mould, scream Carr (marked examples exist). What's more, the plaque is dated July 1st, 1850.
The quality of the later examples of the Carr verse plaques is poor, with the transfer imprints looking faint and worn, so we can be sure that the 'Seaham' plaques came first, and pre-date July 1st, 1850. So the E. Towning born in Stockton in 1860 is highly unlikely to be the person celebrated on the plaques.
Norman has, however, come up trumps in finding a link between the Sailor's Return transfer, and the large dated (1847) Seaham jug in the Sunderland Museum (below left). He owns a frog mug (below right) with the same Mariners' Compass transfer as the signed jug. Note the two blemishes circled in the final detail below, which appear on both the jug and the mug.
So if we're now sure that Norman's frog mug is Seaham, how does the frog in his mug compare with the one in my Seaham-attributed mug with the Sailor's Return? My frog is on the left below, and he's an ugly brute, with traces of enamel decoration. However, I'm happy that they are a perfect match (click on the images to enlarge and move between them). There are slight differences where the potter has used a tool to bind the limbs of the frog to the inside of the mug, but their bodies appear to be from the same press mould. Note the moulded eyes on the sides of the frogs' heads. N.B. the frog takes up more space in Norman's smaller mug.
For those doubters who think all frogs look alike, take a look at the variety of Sunderland frogs below. The first, attributed to Newbottle, is the closest match, but it has smooth, rather than pitted, skin.
I've e-mailed the Sunderland Museum to see if I can get a photo of the frog in the other frog mug at the start of this post. Although the mug is attributed to Seaham, it has decorative features associated with Stockton. A look at its frog might help move the attribution on.
For any diehards who have read this far, here's a sneak preview of my new Sunderland pottery transfers site. I haven't advertised its presence yet, as it is just a few jotted notes.
Thanks to Shauna at the Sunderland Museum for getting back to me about the Seaham/Stockton 'Sailor's Return' mug in their collection. It doesn't have a frog, so we're no further forward I'm afraid. Although that's yet one more difference between the mug and its known Seaham counterparts.
In my previous post I showed a grainy picture of a plaque titled 'Paul Jones' from an old auction catalogue. Below left is its pair, also inscribed 'A Present for E Towning'. Recently a similar plaque came up on eBay, this time with a hand-painted dedication to 'Harriet' – perhaps a sailor bought it as a gift for his sweetheart. If you were the buyer, please get in touch – I'd love a better photo.
This Sailor's Return transfer is attributed to Seaham, and also appears on very large frog mugs like the one below (click on the images to enlarge). The lustre decoration is similar to that on the 1847 Seaham jug (see centre below) in the Sunderland Museum. The final image shows the mug's immense size, next to a slop bowl with a similar transfer.
Closer inspection shows that the transfer on the slop bowl, although based on the same image, has some marked differences to the transfer on the mug. Note the lantern in the background in the right image, and the positioning of the sailor's bag.
The transfers on the slop bowl match those on a large frog mug in the Sunderland Museum, also attributed to Seaham Pottery. However, their lustre decoration is unlike any of the items attributed to Seaham so far.
To my mind, the items above look much more like wares from the Stockton Pottery of Thomas Ainsworth (see below). The circular plaques are sometimes found with impressed marks with a castle and anchor (see below centre), so the attribution for these items is pretty solid. Stockton items are often typified by what Ian Sharp has called 'slug trail' decoration. Note also the bands of lustre around the top of the jug, and compare them with the bowl and the mug above.
So the jury is out on the attribution of the slop bowl and second mug. As I've said before, attributing items on the basis of lustre decoration is an imprecise science, so more work needs to be done. As always, if you have items with these transfers that might help, please get in touch.
Depending on your perspective, John Paul Jones was either the father of the US Navy and hero of the American Revolutionary War (below right), or a pirate (below left). The transfer that appears on Seaham Pottery items is untitled, so it is hard to be 100% sure of its subject, and I haven't been able to identify the source. The Sunderland Museum display states that the figure is Byron. But I've also seen him listed (incorrectly) as Jack Crawford. Perhaps there was a commercial advantage in deliberately leaving his identity open. However, I'm still haunted by the centre image below from an old auction catalogue. (If you own the plaque, please get in touch!) Someone at the Seaham Pottery decided, for one day at least, that the image was to be titled 'Paul Jones'.
The jug below, in the Sunderland Museum collection, is catalogued as 'probably Seaham Pottery', but I'm unsure on what basis. In fact, there are a whole group of distinctive transfers catalogued this way, which appear to be unique to the pottery. (More on that in the future.)
The jug has a bridge transfer (left below) very similar to the one on the large Seaham jug in the museum (centre below), dated 1847, but they are different - from memory, the transfer on the large jug is smaller. The below right image is from an Albion Pottery (Tyneside) plaque, c1864. Again it is different - note the triangular sail on the front of the large ship in the foreground.
The bowl below, from John Howard's archived items, has 'Paul Jones', accompanied by a very distinctive ship transfer, which to date I've only seen on the large Seaham jug in the museum collection (bottom centre and right). I'm unsure whether the two ships come from the same copper plate (without a high resolution image, it's difficult to tell). John's bowl has a bridge transfer that matches the one on the smaller jug above.
Anyway, here's the exciting thing, for me at least. I've long known that the plaque on the left below was likely Seaham, but I couldn't reconcile that with the fact that identical plaques are found with religious verses – same unusual large size (215 x 238 mm), buttery lustre, and distinctive decoration. Those verse transfers (the very same ones) also appear on 1850s' plaques with the John Carr & Sons impress. So how did the copper transfer plates find their way from south of Sunderland, up to North Shields on the Tyne?
I think the answer could be in the advert below. John Hedley Walker, the owner of the Seaham Pottery, moved his operations to Carr's Hill Pottery near Gateshead in 1849. Now, lest we get too excited, 'Carr's Hill' refers to a village, and not to the North Shields potter of the same name. However, this does provide a plausible explanation for why the copper plates might have migrated northwards beyond Sunderland to Tyneside.
Thanks to Ian Sharp for getting in touch and pointing out the Byron connection to Seaham. Byron married Annabella Milbanke at Seaham Hall in 1815. So the pottery had more reason than most to celebrate the poet. Byron spent time in Greece and had himself painted in Greek dress (see right below). So it's possible the transfer depicts him. We may never know until we discover the source for the transfer.
The Seaham jug in the Sunderland Museum (see previous post) provides a catalogue of transfers used by Walker & Co at that pottery in 1847. This is a great resource, because Seaham items are nearly always unmarked, and difficult to attribute.
I thought I'd check items in my own collection and see if I could find a match, and where better to start than the Mariner's Compass, which has always been a favourite transfer.
The transfer on the Seaham jug is easily distinguishable from the transfer found on plaques attributed to Newbottle and Moore's (a Newbottle plaque shown on the right below). Compare the two details, each from the item above. N.B. the transfer on the jug (left) is applied to a curved surface, so there are distortions of perspective, but even so, it's clear that the transfers come from different copper plates. The shading of the fur on the lion's cheek is running in a different direction. The tufts of grass in the foreground are different.
But I did manage to find two items that matched (see below). Again, you need to remember the transfers are on curved surfaces, and stretched in different directions. But the shading on the lion and the tufts of grass now match. We know that the first jug, with coloured enamels was made earlier, because the other two objects show scratches on the copper plate that don't appear on the first.
Look at the lower right quadrant of the shield (third row below). The centre jug and the bowl have a dark line through the diagonal white band that doesn't appear on the first. Also look at the lower left points of the star in the centre of the compass (bottom row). The centre jug and the bowl have a scratch coming off the point at SSW, but again the first doesn't.
The scratches show that the Seaham jug in the Sunderland Museum and my bowl have transfers that are indisputably from the same copper plate. But are there any imperfections that tie together the two jugs? I believe there are. Firstly, the engraver looks to have slipped, and there's a small diagonal fleck that appears to the left of SSW. Secondly, the shading of the waistcoat of the male figure spills over slightly onto his left lapel.
So I have at least two items of Seaham Pottery. The bowl, which has very similar decoration to the Sunderland Museum jug, was likely also made by Walker & Co, c1847. The jug with coloured enamels is earlier but whether made by Walker & Co, John Allason, or an earlier partnership at Seaham, it's hard to say.
By looking at the other transfers on my jug and bowl we can further expand the Seaham 'catalogue'. If you have a similar item you'd like me to take a look at, please get in touch.
Arguably, the most impressive item in the Sunderland Museum and Winter Gardens' collection of local pottery is the Seaham Jug. It was purchased with Art Fund money in 1994, a decade after Baker's book on Sunderland Pottery was last updated. The book contains surprisingly little information about the pottery that produced this spectacular item. Baker lists Seaham's products as 'brown ware and transfer-printed tableware'.
The inscription on the jug includes a painted factory mark 'Walker & Co, Seaham Pottery 1847' (click images to enlarge). However, his ownership is only hinted at in Baker.
I am indebted to local historian Fred Cooper for the press cuttings that follow, and to Shauna Gregg at the Sunderland Museum and Winter Gardens for the photos of pottery.
Baker suggests the pottery was built 'in 1836 by Captain Plowright of Lynn for the manufacture of brown ware'. The pottery was then owned by 'a group of workers from Dawson's Pottery who converted the works to the production of printed white ware', and operated between 1838 and 1841.
The first cutting is from the Newcastle Courant, November 6th, 1840. It advertises the sale of an earthenware manufactory with 'peculiar recommendations' to 'small capitalists especially'.
The list of effects confirms Baker's description above and includes 'four printing presses' and 'several copper plates, of new and approved patterns'.
Contrary to Baker's dates, the factory appears to have then been run by John Allason between 1841 and 1846. Here's an item with the impressed mark 'John Allason, Seaham Pottery' from the Sunderland Museum collection.
The advert below, interestingly from the Staffordshire Advertiser, tries to attract buyers from the other side of the country. The advert draws attention to the close proximity to the docks, railway and colliery district – factors which created a huge competitive advantage for north-east pottery manufacturers.
From 1846 to 1850, the pottery was owned by John Hedley Walker. So the Sunderland Museum jug fits in here, made in 1847 by 'Walker & Co'.
In March 1849, there's a notice in the Newcastle Guardian offering the premises to let 'immediately', and Walker appears to have moved to Carr's Hill Pottery, near Gateshead.
Walker sold the premises at an auction on December 11th, 1850 (this notice taken from the Newcastle Journal, November 23rd, 1850). The property is again offered for 'immediate possession'.
The property appears to have been bought by R.C. Wilson, but his ownership was short lived. An advert in the Newcastle Courant, September 10th, 1852, describes R.C. Wilson as 'a bankrupt', and offers the pottery's effects, including copper plates, for sale without reserve.
The misfortunes of the pottery continue with a fire in 1854 'entirely consuming' the premises (this cutting from the Newcastle Guardian, April 1st, 1854).
Interestingly, Baker writes that 'Fordyce in his History of the County of Durham, 1857, states that Seaham Harbour Pottery belongs to Mr John Hedley Walker'. However, it seems unlikely that after having to let the property in 1849, and after it had driven R.C. Wilson to bankruptcy, that Walker would want to rebuild it.
Last weekend I discovered another copper transfer plate in the Sunderland Museum. It's an exhibit I'd overlooked before because it is concealed in an unmarked drawer under one of the displays. Like the other in their collection, which I've written about before, it was donated by descendants of the owners of Ball's Deptford Pottery.
The images on the plate are a hotchpotch of armorials, verses, ships and a half-length portrait of Garibaldi. The New Sunderland Bridge opened in 1859, the Agamemnon was caught in a storm in 1858, and the Gauntlet Clipper appeared in the London Illustrated News in 1853, so the plate was engraved after 1859.
Some of these images appear on Garrison Pottery items, but also on items from Scott's. For a long while I assumed that the copper plate had passed from Garrison to Scott's, when the Dixon partnership was disbanded in 1865 (see here). But it's now clear there were two copper plates, with near identical designs.
The first column of images below shows the Scott versions, for comparison with the copper plate in the second column, and the Dixon versions in the third. The 'Scott' Agamemnon (and the Garibaldi) is taken from a bowl, so the transfer appears distorted as it is applied to a curved surface. The 'Manchester Unity' on the bottom left is taken from a mug. All of the other transfers details come from photos of plaques. Click on the images to enlarge them, and to move between them.
The Dixon transfers are finer than those used by Scott (N.B. the lower left, 'Manchester Unity', mug was likely made after the transfer plate had passed from Scott's to Ball's). The Forester's transfers are so dissimilar as to dispel any ideas that the differences might be down to re-engraving of the transfer plate at a later date.
I did find a small dink on the copper plate that shows in the Scott transfers, but not on the Dixon transfer. Take a look at the details from the Gauntlet Clipper below. There is a dark, horizontal scratch that appears in the centre of the copper plate detail, and also on the Scott detail (left). However, there's no sign of it on the Dixon transfer (right).
Attributions would be so much easier if more of these copper plates had survived. It's great news when another plate turns up!
Last year I obsessed about a Moore attribution for brown-bordered plaques. The good thing about a sound attribution is that the more items that turn up, the stronger the attribution becomes. The four plaques below, I think, further strengthen the argument that the brown-bordered plaques were made by Moore's and not Scott's. Although all the plaques below are unmarked, few would dispute that the first plaque is Moore's, because the pink-bordered decoration is very typical of that pottery and found on many marked pieces.
The first thing to note is that the brown-bordered plaques are usually larger than their pink counterparts. Here are the two Odd Fellows plaques laid side by side. The brown-bordered plaque is almost an inch longer on either side.
But now look at the two Sailor's Farewells, which you would expect to be the same size. Although they both have brown borders, one plaque is about an inch shorter than the other on either side.
So despite their different decoration, the two smaller plaques look as if they came from the same mould. The small Sailor's Farwell is perhaps a transitional item made around 1860, before Moore's abandoned their smaller moulds in favour of bigger plaques.
Finally look at the decoration of the two Odd Fellows plaques. It is hard to believe that they weren't decorated in the same pottery.
So if the two smaller plaques came from the same mould, they were likely potted in the same place. If the two Odd Fellows plaques have the same decoration, they were likely decorated in the same place. And that place seems most likely to be Moore's.
Thanks to Ian Sharp for drawing my attention to a copper transfer plate used by Maling, and given to the Laing Art Gallery by Frederick Maling in 1938 (see Moore and Ross, 'Maling - The Trade Mark of Excellence'). Huge thanks also to Sarah Richardson and Amy Barker at Tyne and Wear Museums for processing my request for an image so quickly. Here it is.
It is similar to one I wrote about a year ago in the Sunderland Museum, except that it includes the 'Crimea' transfer. The transfers of the Sailor's Farwell and Return are almost identical to the versions used by Moore's in Sunderland (more on that later). But this transfer plate comes from Tyneside. The transfers appear on a fabulous wedding jug I picked up a year ago (click to enlarge and move between the images below). The jug is unmarked, but has a date inscription of 1857.
The images are difficult to compare, but after an hour of squinting at photos, I'm satisfied the transfers on my jug originate from this copper plate. When flicking from image to image, please bear in mind that the jugs' transfers have been applied to a curved surface, which distorts the imprint here and there.
Giving the jug a firm Maling attribution helps with a plaque I'd been wondering about. Both Maling and Fell used versions of the bridge transfer below. But the similarity of decoration with the jug (see images below) makes me more confident of a Maling attribution.
As promised above, here are Moore's (Sunderland) versions of the same transfers. Very similar at first glance, but clearly from another transfer plate. So there are at least 4 similar versions of this group of transfers (Maling, Moore, Scott and the transfer plate donated by the Ball's family to the Sunderland Museum).
Finally, below is mug made by Maling in the 1930s with imprints from the same transfer plate. Thanks to Ian Sharp for the photos below. Ian sold the cup as a reproduction and writes:
The mug was produced for a London retailer during the 1930s. Many other items within this range were produced including Masonic jugs, plates, bowls and frog mugs. Many of these pieces were frequently unmarked, as requested by the retailer! Many, however, were produced bearing the Maling Castle mark which was used during the period. The transfers were taken from the original 19th century copper plate which was in Maling’s possession.
To the untrained eye, this mug looks to be a typical 19th century piece. However, the lustre application is not typical with that of an earlier piece, the colour is also “wrong”. The handle is shaped and moulded to the body as opposed to being applied seperately. The shape and size of the mug does look typical of an earlier piece.
Less reputable or less knowledgeable dealers, and even auctions houses, frequently pass these items off for 19th century originals. At the time of writing there is a masonic bowl on eBay with a price tag of almost $1000. Buyer beware!
Stephen Smith lives in London, and is always happy to hear from other collectors. If you have an interesting collection of plaques, and are based in the UK, he will photograph them for you. Free advice given regarding selling and dispersal of a collection, or to those wishing to start one. Just get in touch...
This website is indebted to collectors, dealers and enthusiasts who have shared their knowledge or photos. In particular: Ian Holmes, Stephen Duckworth, Dick Henrywood, Norman Lowe, Keith Lovell, Donald H Ryan, Harold Crowder, Jack and Joyce Cockerill, Myrna Schkolne, Elinor Penna, Ian Sharp, Shauna Gregg at the Sunderland Museum, Keith Bell, Martyn Edgell, and Liz Denton.